October 26, 2007

So Long Typepad

With the help of Jay Westerdal at Domaintools.com I have just migrated to a "Wordpress" account. Jay is the most famous Internet entrepreneur to ever build something for a domainer.  One day you will read this post and say "holy moses" can you believe "Jay" and his team built something like this for a regular individual?"

Thanks a million Jay..  Special props to you mister unspoken techie at domaintools. You are my real American hero.

You can find me at SevenMile.com from now on..  Me worry about duplicate blog content and it's impact within Google's algo?!?.. You gotta be kidding me..  Haven't you read this blog?..  If you can't type SevenMile.com in your address bar .. You need to stay in Google's insular world and read my content scraped second hand on a reader or a third party site.  Thanks for the memories Typepad.. it was fun ;)

Microsoft Domain Name Registration Blowout

DannoDanno sends link:

http://www.webpronews.com/blogtalk/2007/10/26/microsofts-domain-name-registration-blowout

(I think most of these are a most likely a result of MS going after people they think are cybersquatting...and not all new domain registrations).

***FS***  Probably so Danno.

Ahmed Farooq on Facebook

http://www.techsoapbox.com:80/even-microsoft-doesnt-value-facebook-at-15-billion-use-your-damn-brain/

***FS***  More quarterbacking on this deal ... Ahmed is a sharp guy.

Traffic Arbitrage for Everyone

Regular reader writes:

""Web traffic arbitrage means a few things.

The best way to learn this is to do some preliminary research and then begin to do it.  It can be done on a very low budget during the learning stage.

I am posting text ads on one network and then sending to parked pages that have an ad feed from a different network.  Doing it very small scale for now, to make sure I really understand the subtleties. Have seen a few darn interesting little profit bubbles. Testing with travel and vehicle related keywords.

I understand now how someone could make $ 1,000 or more in one day doing
this. Not easy to do, but possibly achievable.

On a separate note. I found an old name of mine that wasn't active.

********.com.

It used to get 4 to 5 type ins a day a few years ago. I turned it on recently, and it's averaging about 55-60 type ins a day. 80 percent of the traffic is USA, Canada, England, Ireland and Australia. Pointed to X (a parking company), and it started making 60 cents a day. Then 4 days later, pointed it to y (a parking company), and it's now making 1.75 - 2.50 a day. I've just signed up for Z (a parking company), and i think it's possible this domain is going to make 4 or 5 dollars a day.

Interesting process.

Great blog, Frank.

Why Is Pool.com Featuring (Probable) Typo Squatting Domain Names In Its Daily Sales Emails?

http://www.semportland.com/domain/why-is-poolcom-featuring-probable-typosquatting-domain-names-in-its-daily-sales-emails/

Todd Mintz raises an excellent question..  Selling TM intent domains has been going on since before Michael Arrington was the CEO at Pool.  I suspect it has less to do with "design" on Pool.com's part and more to do with the sheer volume of names expiring.  You can only prescreen so far. Still, a rudimentary filter or diclosure relating to trademarks would not be that difficult and would probably help as this industry matures.

1&1 Says That .US Registrations are Up

King_among_princes From Ron Jackson's October 26th 2007 DN Journal Lowdown

***FS***  I like CC Tld's a great deal.. On a relative percentage basis I don't like .us as much because the defacto .us extension is really .com in the hearts and minds of the US populace. Still, I do believe in .us as a long term alternative to .com as good names get scarce.

The Value of Mobile Internet Traffic

"What is a click-through on a mobile phone worth?"

http://domainnamewire.com/2007/10/24/mobile-ads-are-worthless/

***FS*** Andrew says not very much, in his experience.  I've always suspected as much.. Picture yourself browsing on your phone..  you have limited battery life..  you're hurried..  The desktop browsing experience is lean-forward marketing..  You're sitting upright in front of your computer..  you're engaged..  you have a workspace and the ability to reach for your credit card.  :)  Not so in the mobile experience,  with the exception of passengers in an automobile.

Patents.com Takes Over PatentMonkey's Assets

Josh sends link:

http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=564

""Sahar makes two very good points.

1. The importance of bringing smart and diverse people together. (I'll add that personality chemistry is vital when doing this.)

2. Predicts that more owners of domain names will build.

As for Patents.com.  While it is a domain name, it is also a potent brand.  That said, imo, not all generic domains are potent brands.  It's determined on a case by base basis.  And it's subjective.""

***FS***  Couldn't have said that last part better myself.

Domain Name Tips and Tricks for Domainers

Richard_quilley Richard Quilley sends some tips and free advice for freshman and sophmore domainers.

""Frank,

At the risk of sounding precocious, I thought your readers might like to share the following tips. I'm at the beginning of the learning curve (6 weeks) and have made plenty of mistakes, so I know what it's like to be starting out with little money.

* Organise domains using Treepad Lite (free). Create categories as you go along - health, alternative health, etc. Highlight important domains by putting stars**** in front of them. The longer the row of stars, the more important the domain. You can then scan the page and see them; you can sort them using TED Notepad (free) and everything with a star in front wil then be at the top of the page

*Cream off the important domains into a separate category to buy.

*Use Domain Name Analyzer (free) to scour through domain names. It's brilliant. Upgrade when you can afford it. Set it up to search for the TLDs you value. It bypasses middleman registrars, so reduces the chances of sniffing.

*If you ever get a complete mess of domains with extensions, and want to sort them by extension, use TED notepad (free). Reverse the text - the extensions are now at the front. Sort. Unreverse.

*Overture and Google Keyword have their place. However, the list crunchers have taken nearly every .com of value. Use O and GK to get ideas. For example, a new technology comes out. Find a similar technology, then use GK and O to see what phrases are of value in that similar technology. Then use those phrases with your new technology. (***FS*** ie. Enter WAP keyword into overture and replace newer phone standard into results where it makes sense)

*.Net of a short snappy name is more valuable than .com of a long name. GolfTips.net is more valuable than AllYourGolfingTipsHere.com. The short snappy name is more memorable and can be used across a wider range of PPC adverts

*Browse the net. Go where you go. There's SOO much stuff out there.

* After a while O and GK seem too slow. A shorthand way is to look at the top of the Google Serps and how many documents cite your phrase. Now glance at the right hand side of the page, at the adverts. (There are adverts, aren't there? If not, it's usually best to leave that phrase.) Now go to page 3 or 4 of the SERPS. Still adverts? Good sign. Decent adverts, as opposed to Ebays dynamic insertion of your keyphrase? Even better. Is your search phrase still appearing in the SERPS? Excellent!

*Different domains have different values. Your made up brand name won't earn you anything right now - don't buy too many of them at once or you'll suffer a cash flow crisis. (Yes, that's me).

*Park at NameDrive - it's SOO easy to join, compared to some of the dinosaurs. Or DomainTools when they come out of Beta. Use your Parking not for revenue (that's a bonus) but to get an idea of which domains are getting type in traffic. In other words, have you got a feel for what is of value. It's great feedback. It also inspires you to set up a site on those names that are getting a trickle of type in traffic. The real value will come from development.

* There's more, but I'm keeping it quiet for now. Hope this helps someone!

Great blog, and thanks for starting me out on this! Richard""

***FS***  You are most welcome Richard... Thanks to you for some outstanding tips and advice!~

The $160 Billion Typo

Danno_2Danno sends timely link:

http://valleywag.com/tech/genius-at-work/

***FS*** This particular piece speaks to the typo dynamic.. but still illustrates the disruptive technology embodied in a great domain.

The Free Internet .. Domain Names as 'Your' Platform

SaharSahar writes:

"Here’s a domain-parking related post on Mashable I found interesting… how parked pages are perceived by non domainers: Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/ Thanks!" "

***FS***  Sahar is correct of course..  Everything in life is a matter of perception or a gradient-optic through which you view things. Create a domain name and point it to your registrar's placeholder page and the name is "unused" ..  add advertising of your own and the name is "parked"..  Heaven forbid your inactive domain with advertising gets indexed into almighty Google..  If this happens by accident or design, you've unwittingly created the sinister sounding "Spam page" .. Point your spam page to another website to make money from those visitors and the name becomes "inactive". At least in some peoples eyes.  Never have so many "inactive" domains made so much, for so many active entrepreneurs.

Life is full of labels and when you're Google and your mission is the domination of Internet search, navigation and online user behavior, then it serves you well to create labels which empower you and weaken those who could challenge you.

I like Google the search utility a great deal, but I am  less than enamored with Google the marketing machine and businessman.  Google has managed to convince the world it does no wrong. It is a "happy fun ball of love" :) Not true of course. Google creates what business people perceive as great wrongs each day, but sells the masses on the fact that those wrongs are either not occurring or justified in the name of a greater Google.

Quote: ""...For Google’s part, the reason these sites are being slammed is because the company’s policy tells web publishers to “avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web.” Do some of the effected blogs sell links to such sites? Perhaps; we’ll let these folks defend themselves and their practices. But the real story is the hypocrisy of Google enforcing this policy on third-party publishers, when within their own engine they profit immensely by selling ads to spammers and so-called “bad neighborhoods.”"

Reading this I was reminded of the gent Vern told me about who attended a recent SES show.  This gent was practically in tears that his livelihood was wiped out after his site was scrubbed from Google's index, and he couldn't for the life of him get an answer or explanation as to what he had done wrong. Google giveth and Google taketh away..  When Google giveth it is your best friend.. But it's really sad to watch the "Google taketh away part" as Verno described it. People starting over..  but not knowing why or where to begin.

""Of course what Google was really doing was playing politics. Better than most, I might add. Sans the lobbyists and open debates, Google was working the people. Price controls? No, Google doesn’t control prices. Google measures quality, and adjusts pricing based on quality scores."" ...  Reading this quote Danno sent from Johnon's blog really struck me... 

As a domainer I get the majority of my traffic from "outside the Google framework". Google knows my sites exist but for the most part they work to actively deny visitors typing the domains I own (at Google) from ever finding my website in their search results.  I exist on the "Free Internet", you can navigate to me in your address bar because I run a real website.  But to believe Google's marketing machine, I reside in the "Bad neighborhoods" of the net. Why else couldn't you find me?  Because my sites advertising made me too much money for Google's liking?  Because I was displaying a Google competitor's ads?

You see Google knows my websites contain advertising. They hypocritically take visitors trying to navigate to my "bad neighborhood" and show show results with different advertising or content... In their view, this 'sleight of hand' miraculously gentrifies the Internet.

Luckily for me, Google only takes the dumbest and laziest of my visitors.  Millions of people say "screw this". Google won't give me the site I really want so I'll just head to my trusty address bar and leave 'the Google' for the site I really wanted. It's frustrating for users, but a necessary frustration that reinforces to users that the authoritative way to locate a website is via the browser,  not 'the Google'.

Plenty of others have been brainwashed into viewing the net the way Google wants them to. Tens of thousands of the Internet's brightest dutifully attend SES, they leave friends, family, loved ones - They miss life's important moments so they can serve the Google. When I look out across the floor of a show like SES, I see a group of people who have largely abandoned the Free Internet in favor of being a servant to the Google.

Remember that guy crying about his lost livelihood at SES?  Everybody attending that conference is "that guy" ..  like the car wreck you pass on your way home during rush hour..  That could have been you. Every person who ignores organic domain name traffic and embraces Google alone is basically selling themselves into a lifetime of servitude..  You are beholden to Google to get your traffic forever. God help you if they turn on you.

I guess a lot of this post is common sense with a bit of bluster.  Buy into another party's "platform" and live and die by "their" platform. Things could be worse I suppose. You can learn the "new smart pricing tricks" in 6-9 months..  and "quality adjustments" can be mastered in another 6 months.. as you gray, dancing to the tune Google plays for you, their black-box ensures that Google's house will always win.  Your revenue will remain flat, theirs won't. You will feel like an entrepreneur, but in the end, "you" work for "them".

Well good luck to you my SEO friends. If you're looking for me, I'll be on the Free Internet..  Buying generic names like Scott Day's DiamondsDirect.com ..  logical sounding generic domains.. I have opted out of the Google traffic generator in favor of creating sites for the 20 or 30 visitors who find their way to names like that each day.  The more sites you acquire the greater the trickle of traffic you get.  Buy enough and the trickle becomes a torrent. You can arbitrage traffic from Google (when they let you) and increasingly from other reliable traffic sources such as Microsoft, Facebook or traditional media in order to sell products, sales leads and other advertising.

When you own a generic domain name you join the Free Internet.. I encourage you to stake your own claim here and release the chains that bend your perception. Long Live the Free Internet.

October 25, 2007

Owen Frager.. Ahead of his Time

Owen Owen writes:

Oh Mr. Schilling... we are getting closer

[http://www.ipodobserver.com/story/33503]
<
Piper Jaffray Raises AAPL Target to $250.00

Piper Jaffray's Gene Munster has raised the target price for AAPL to US$250 from $222 based on a detailed iPhone revenue analysis, according to CNBC on Thursday.

While Leopard's launch is expected to add US$240M to Apple's bottom line this quarter, the real story accrding to Gene Munster is a detailed revenue analysis of the iPhone in the outyears.

Mr. Munster is now modelling Apple to sell 3.4 million iPhones in calendar 2007, 12.9 million in 2008, and 45 million by the end of 2009. Based on revenue sharing agreeements with AT, reductions in the price of the phone, [leading to greater sales] and expanded worldwide sales, Mr. Munster set his target at $250.00.

"It's a compelling case, even as Apple shares continue to climb," noted CNBC reporter Jim Goldman.

OF: And still NINE weeks till Christmas <http://frankschilling.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/05/owen_frager_for.html> !

--
Posted By  s  to  The Frager Factor <
http://fragerfactor.blogspot.com/2007/10/oh-mr-schilling-we-are-getting-closer.html>   at  10/25/2007 09:26:00 PM

Opera to Make Mobile Browsing Feel Like Desktop

Opera's new web browsers will allow their standard browser and mobile web browser to share bookmarks. from the article: "Opera is a popular browsing choice for smartphones running Symbian.  The idea behind Opera's mobile products is similar to how Apple CEO Steve Jobs has sold the iPhone: smartphone users will no longer endure a compromised Internet experience on their phones, von Tetzchner said."

Josh hypothesizes: "Over time, content developers will be less concerned about creating separate content or separate websites for mobile phones. In 2006, JD powers claimed that "The average replacement cycle for a typical handset is 17.6 months". My hunch is that many many people will have access to this more compelling way to view the web with a mobile phone over the next 24 months. .mobi?"

http://www.news.com/8301-13579_3-9804007-37.html

(JD power data) http://www.jdpower.com/corporate/news/releases/pressrelease.aspx?ID=2006075

The "Real" Reason Sites Like Facebook.com are Worth Billions

You_love_the_internet A new poll shows that nearly 1 in 4 Americans say the Internet could be a stand-in for a significant other for a period of time

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9804144-7.html

Josh says: "Many people really really really like the Net. (Isn't it fun to state the obvious.)"

***FS***  Yes it is brother Josh  :)

Best Approach for Appraising Domain Names

http://www.circleid.com/posts/7102311_appraising_domain_names/

Alex_t Post by Alex Tajirian on Circleid.com who conducts an appraisal of domain appraisals.

I look at domain names based on a few criteria, some are technical and some relate to unspoken metrics...  the feel of the name.

Like any real world appraisal it depends on how you are using the asset.  A vacant low-lying piece of land surrounded by high ridges and lined in clay may be worthless as a residential real estate site, but priceless as a landfill. Similarly, the value of a domain name changes depending on whether you're building a media co on domain foundations, or whether you're in the business of selling the names themselves.

This topic deserves a more thorough future post.

Are domain names suddenly too sexy?

http://www.flixya.com/post/PUREvil/40068/Are_domain_names_suddenly_too_sexy

Quote:  "From the early inception, domain names were treated like third-class citizens in the corporate arenas and also by all the legislative bodies around the globe. After all, these names were very cheap and very easy to get."

***FS*** The headline caught my attention :) Fairly weak domain name related piece.. with the exception of the above quote which perfectly synopsizes why the modern domain name industry "is what it is".

Whizzbang: Traffic Quality: Part 4, End of Series.

Mg http://www.whizzbangsblog.com/content/view/301/86/

Lot of work Michael..  very well put together

Sedo wins Ernst and Young's Entrepreneur of the Year Award

http://www.domaininformer.com:80/news/press/071025Sedo.html

Sedo The entrepreneurial stories run 'thick and wide' in this industry...  Former recipients of the Ernst and Young Entrepreneur of the Year award include Oversee's Lawrence Ng, and Marchex's Russ Horowitz.  Expect many more to come before the industry grows up.  E&Y should get an award for consistently singling out the shine that permeates the foundations of this space.

Congraulations to Sedo.com

ICANN Investigates Snatching of Domain Names

Charlie sends link:

ICANN investigates snatching of domain names:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20071024.wgtsnatch1024/BNStory/Technology/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20071024.wgtsnatch1024

""The Internet's key oversight agency is investigating suspicions that insider information is being used to snatch desired domain names before an individual or business can register them.

The Security and Stability Advisory Committee of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers termed the practice "domain name front running" and likened it to a stock broker buying or selling shares ahead of a client's trade, in anticipation of a movement in price. In the case of Internet addresses, many people who see a domain name available the first time they check it out, find it already taken by the time they return to buy it.

That has led to suspicions that someone with access to [whois] search requests has been using the information to gauge interest in a domain name. By buying the domain first, that person can then try to sell it to the interested party for a profit. This is different from traditional domain name speculation because the buyer knows for sure that the address is of interest.

Although the practice has never been proved, the ICANN committee said the perception that it is happening "portrays an unfavorable image of the parties associated with the domain name registration process in specific, and of the domain name community in general."

The committee said it wants to prevent "perception from evolving to accepted wisdom." The committee cited several ways front running may be happening, including the installation of viruses and other software programmed to collect such information and the use of unscrupulous third-party sites to check domain name availability. Coincidence also was cited as a possibility.

ICANN is trying to gather evidence on whether it is occurring and, if so, whether policies or other measures are required to restrict the practice.""

***FS***  You go to an ICANN accredited registrar to look up a domain name.. or you search for a public WHOIS tool via Google. You start entering domain names in that whois site to explore for an unregistered name ...  The whois logs the domain lookups, then the people running that whois register the domain names that you looked up, before you can..  they taste the names for 5 days to see if the name you guided them to gets any traffic, then they spit back the names which didn't get traffic so you can register them.

The problem is that we all register domain names, looking for organic traffic that will beat a path to our door. Nobody registers a domain name hoping that no soul will ever come to visit the site created there.

The whois/registrar operators who engage in this pre-screen or who front-run in this fashion, cream what you would call "the good ones" off the top.

The only good thing about this is it allows us all to be honest with each other.  All domain names are not created equally..  There are good ones and there are bad ones..  The good ones are generic and contain organic type in traffic which comes for nothing more than the keyword weight or the gravity of the name itself.  With ICANN's help, to control overfishing there will be more generic stock in the name pool for everyone.  There is a replenishment cycle as new vernacular and hot-trends get re-created.

October 24, 2007

GoDaddy Premium Auction List Published

Godaddy http://www.domainnamenews.com/domain-aftermarket/godaddy-signature-domain-auction-list-announced/929

I was expecting more names in the list and more two word .com phrases..  less alternative TLDs..  Not sure if this auction will be a hit.

Microsoft Values Facebook at 15 billion.. Domains Name Valuations in a Bubble

Facebook http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ah_myY3uN0pE&refer=home

I am consistently dumbstruck that deals like this barely raise an eyebrow, while individual domain names, the foundational elements of the Internet, get compared to tulip manias and bubbles.

It's a strange upside down world we live in.. Domain name monetization has been going on in much the same way since adult webmasters began selling monthly memberships to porn sites in 1995 (3 years after the birth of the modern web browser) ..  Today we have paid search monetization sites for virtually every product and service under the sun. Many are moving away from straight parking toward lead generation, arbitrage, content delivery and pay-per-unique implementations.

But these simple sites which for years have made money in the most benign of ways are 'bubbles' while the publicly listed internet economy, consisting of plates spinning on the ends of pool cues is accepted as foundationally sound and airtight.

All a fellow can do is smile, shrug and keep cashing those checks. It's too tiring and unproductive to pen a counterpoint to each person who don't understand.. or who doesn't want to understand.

Suffice it to say that the Internet has already crashed and burned once ..  domain names did not experience that shock..  If there is a redux of 2000/2001 you can expect domain names to perform in a similar manner as before.

I'm not so sure all of Facebook's 15 Billion will come out the same way.

Michael Gilmour Marks Domain Stock Milestone

http://www.whizzbangsblog.com/content/view/302/86/

MgWhizzbang excited as Dark Blue Sea (Fabulous) hits $1 per share.  This company would have so much greater valuation if they listed in the US or London.  Great break-up value and assets in the corp..  Low type-in producing names were acquired much later in the game.  I still remember their IP addresses running through our categories and subcategories back when they were getting started..  These guys have come a long way.

Ebay Opens Microfinancing Site.

Loan $100 to an entrepreneur in "developing countries".

Josh says: "Good to see more of these opening up."

http://www.news.com/New-eBay-site-lets-people-finance-worlds-poor/2100-1038_3-6214974.html?tag=nefd.top

***FS***  I was just contemplating making a loan to somebody via prosper.com when it occurred to me that I could build a similar site at personalloans.com and plumb all my loan traffic to that site to kick-start things.  Great times to be a developer/name owner

Ron Jackson on The Death of News on Paper.

King_among_princesIn today's (Oct 24th 2007) Lowdown

http://www.dnjournal.com/lowdown.htm

***FS***  Well said Ron.   We all know it's coming..  Some folks can't see the forest for the trees..  but they will.  Ron references this piece in CNN Money

My favorite quote: "You know you are fading into obscurity when finanancial analysts won't even bother to cover your industry any more." ..   So true.

TechCrunch Blog (website) Brings in 2.88 M in Ad Revenue Per Year

http://www.sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/21/BUVJSNSTC.DTL

***FS***  Power to the Blogger

Verisign to Offer "Pre-Domain Tasting"

http://www.domainnamenews.com/editorial/verisign-to-profit-from-rootserver-data/889#more-889

FmAs reported by Frank Michlick on DNN Verisign plans to provide a batched service which allows registrars to upload a list of names, and in return receive a report which lists which names encounter “lookup traffic” over a certain period of time.

It's a natural progression I suppose.. It would create much less load on Verisign registry infrastructure that the large scale acquisition and deletion of domain names via traditional domain tasting and would provide similar data.

That lower server and bandwidth load should allow for diminished overhead costs that the Verisign registry could pass on to registrants in the form of lower name purchase and renewal costs ... Don't count on that last part though.

Geo Domain Conference

Overview of upcoming Geo Domain conference.

Ron Jackson is the keynote speaker. Dan Pulcrano, David Castello, Ahmed Farooq and others will be speaking.

Josh says: Geo is hot and real. You can touch local. You can be virtually local/global. Names of places change very rarely, unlike some word trends that fall in and out of fashion.

http://www.associatedcities.com/news.php?newsID=131

***FS*** I kind of view everything as local..  but it's hard to change human behavior and people naturally grivitate to typing domain names which describe their local jurisdiction or desired subject matter: ( ie.  seattleplumbers.com, travelchina.com)  ..  I'm sure an individual could learn a great deal attending a conference like this.

Domains That Aren't II

You can register "7mile.com" here for $ 25 a year, it's available. This idea is a recipe for plenty of confusion.

http://VirtuaDOM.com/

Quote: "Congratulations! You've taken your first step to having your very own website on the Virtual Wide Web..."

***FS*** As if the real Internet weasn't virtual enough..  This concept comes around again and again in different shapes and sizes.. I view it as a distraction from from real investing in real domain names, which resolve everywhere, right now.

October 23, 2007

Dollar Drops, Domain Names Rise

DannoDanno sends link:

http://domainnamewire.com/2007/10/23/dollar-drops-domain-names-rise/

Dan

***FS*** I've been thinking the same thing..  Good to have some domains.  Only problem is that traffic payments are made in USD.. so we're not as imune from dollar flux as we might seem. Viewed through another optic,  traffic is getting cheaper.

TRAFFIC Eeast 2007 Roundup in Domain Name Journal

King_among_princes_2 http://www.dnjournal.com/articles/events/traffic-east-2007.htm

Wonderful TRAFFIC conference wrap-up for those who couldn't attend the show and those who'd like to reminisce.. Feels just like yesterday. Well done Ron.

Domainer Chris Chena Acquires TV Channel

Chena http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007172-paraguayan-domainer-chris-chena-acquires-tv-channel.html

Josh

says:

"Looking at Chris's track record, he's a guy who understood certain things before others, and flourished. Moving into old school TV bucks surface trends. It's not always about money. That said, my hunch is that he's likely to create a strong and dynamic relationship between his "TV Channel" and a web strategy, which is likely to also add financial strength to his project."

From the press release: "One of the primary reasons of this acquisition is to make sure that this important medium of communications and source of work for local media professionals remains in Paraguayan hands, with the goal of improve all parts of the company and increasing its national production."

***FS*** I think its a natural progression..  online and TV.. one playing into the other.  It's good media diversification. If I could buy a channel somewhere within the realm of affordability, I would too.  TV channels and networks probably cheaper in Paraguay than in the Caymans or USA.  ;)

Traffic Quality Part 3 on Michael Gilmour's Blog

Mg http://www.whizzbangsblog.com/content/view/300/86/

More great charts in this piece..  I never liked Google "smart-pricing" because it rates Google's own traffic at the 100% level..  If your traffic converts better than Google's (which most domain traffic does) you don't get paid any extra. This is going to backfire at some point as the good traffic gets removed and sold to lead-gen guys and others who get this..  leaving the se3cond rate traffic on PPC networks.. not today tho.

October 22, 2007

Domain Tasting and Trolling From Your Whois Lookups

Tim writes:
""Frank:
<As always, feel free to post this if you feel it is a, imformative, and b, not too stupid a question!!!>
I am intrigued (and frustrated) by a phenomenon I had read about, but only recently actually experienced.  Going through a registration service, both a partner and I ran some names but did not complete the purchases, pending further discussions on their viability and usefulness.  The next day, upon trying to register them, they were gone.
This happened on 2 different occasions, less than ten days apart.
I had read about trolling software, but could not see how this would necessarily work.  My first thought was our computer had been compromised, or our account had been compromised.  These were quickly ruled out as the 2 instances were done on different computers, in different locations, using different registration accounts.  So my only conclusion is, either it is software on the providers' end, or it is someone within the provider who sees the names are checked, but not registered, and likes them for their own.  If it is the latter, I question the levels of integrity of the individuals and secuirty of the service.
The really disturbing side to this, both names were registered by the same entity, a day following our looking up availability...  A fact that seems to point to less than coincidence...
Other than to say "register the names as soon as you establish they are available" (learned that one...), I am interested in your feedback and insight on this.

Tim.
PS Liked the article on names meanings to different parties.  Pretty clear where that one came from!!!""
***FS***  It's an unfortunate reality..  Some folks are too expedient to dream up their own names so they let you do the heavy lifting ..  looking up names and then they troll your whois-lookups, registering anything unregistered for domain tasting or for keeps.
Use a reputable ungamed whois like Domaintools.com or Betterwhois.com and you should be fine..  Then again,  these are competitive times in domaining and if you touched on a popular vein,  then it could simply be a coincidence..  Check who registered the names..  If they are registered to different parties, then it's likely a coincidence.
Thanks for your compliment on the blog-post  ;)

A Search Engine .. Powered by Millions of Domain Names

Danno writes:

Danno"Hi,

If there ever was a time in human history for a few 'domainers' and a few 'seo'ers/sem'ers' that understand domains and Internet search...to come together.

Now would be the time to for a "Field of Dreams" moment... 'build it and they will come'.

___

Dogpile Beats Google, Again Top Search Engine in Customer Satisfaction
http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2007/10/18/dogpile-beats-google-again-top-search-engine-in-customer-satisfaction/

Peace!
Dan"

***FS***  A bunch of domain registrants plumbing their traffic from countless individual names to the results page realting to the name's subject matter within the search engine.  Type eatingdisorders.com and get to Dogpile results for "eating disorders"  ..  Not a bad idea Danno..  but if you really think about it,  we already have that in the form of Google..  GOOG gets millions of unique visits each day to their domainpark syndication channel from domains like yours and mine  ;) ..  still this engine would be owned by the domain registrants .. a co-op..  I like the idea..  but it's hard to align interests. Great idea Danno.

Unlocking the Latent Value of Domain Names

SaharGreat posts today on Sahar's blog:

From Registration Fee To Millions..

Sahar links hope and inspiration to the affordable aspect of domain names, and the ensuing possibilities related to them as cornerstones for many things.

Josh says: Sahar is a smart cookie.
http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=545

[and]

Every Strong Generic Domain Is a Million Dollars+ Property.

Sahar reflects on the present, and peers into the future. The power and importance of language and words is becoming magnified by the web. Think of a word.  Type it in. Whammo.
http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=544

Domain Investing.. Why Can't We All Live in Beverly Hills?

Bh Josh sends link:

"Mark Sutcliffe of CanWest News Service calls for end to "domain hogging" "If you don't use a domain, it should get thrown back and opened up."

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/financialpost/printedition/story.html?id=93656a38-c4c2-45cf-a03c-667bdd89e98f

I'm sure corporations would love that.. Is AOL a domain-hog taking the love out of the Internet (Love.com) and redirecting it to their dating site? How about CNET with their terrific inactive names like Kids.com ..it's a dressed-up paid-search parking page.. Couldn't Disney or Nickelodeon do a better job with Kids.com? How about companies like IAC, Demand Media and Marchex who have invested collective billions buying domains (for cash) and developing them to limited and varying degrees?  How many domain-names are too-many?  Who gets to say what is 'active' or 'developed'? Who gets to judge what is acceptable development progress year to year? A lot of domain registrants are making a fortune slowly developing media companies around their names. Can latecomers rewrite the rules surrounding name ownership because they fell asleep at the wheel and missed one of the greatest opportunities of their lifetime... or because they are not satisfied with the pace of a potential competitor's development? Should we live in a "domain police state", under the constant specter of being unseated from our names because somebody else might want what we have?  Does this apply to large companies or just to cottage industry folks without the means to resist such proposterous inequity.

Funny enough you never read stories like this relating to hard assets, real estate..  tangibles..  but there is an entitlement mindset on the Internet where old-schoolers wax philisophical about the simpler times and many of those folks feel like they shouldn't have to pay for things, they should be free on an as-needed basis, forever. I view this article as high minded socialist fluff mixed with a twist of naive utopianism, but the fact that he wrote the piece at all indicates to me that some traditional media folks are starting to realise they have been outflanked. They are slowly "getting" the importance and value of .com domain names and are shocked to find them 'gone'. If everyone could just be satisfied with those traffic-less .info's, .mobi's and .biz's, you wouldn't read a story like this. 

In the end if you want to see the culprit responsible for the lack of "good" available domain names in the coveted .com suffix, look in the mirror. There are nowhere near enough meaningful domain combinations in .com land for everyone to own even a single name.  It is simply not possible. There are just too many people, too many businesses on this planet.  So if Mark wants a great .com domain name.. or even an average domain name..  he is going to have to do what everyone who wants something of finite quantity and great desirability does..  He will have to reach into his wallet and pay the party he wishes to displace.  Just as they will have to pay him once he owns a domain name and doesn't wish to give it up.

Welcome to capitalism and free-enterprise Marko!~ ;)

RutabagaAs I'm fond of saying: "Next time you bite into your Big Mac you should thank God we have capitalism..  lest you wake up from your dream in North Korea chewing on a raw rutabaga".

Domain Names the New Network TV Affiliates

Bw_tvI love Television .. Growing up as a German immigrant (the son of German immigrants) in Hamilton Ontario, I learned English by watching television. The first TV I can remember watching was a Cheerios commercial during cartoons on Buffalo 7 .. For years I watched TV on the family's 19 inch Black-and-White set.. It wasn't until the late 70's that we could afford our first color TV (a 24" Hitachi")  ..  I had to think about that this morning as I watched MTV on my new Panasonic 103" .. the set cost more to buy and install than the home I used to watch cartoons from.

When I was 9 the family packed up the car and moved west to Vancouver..  I was amazed at the reach of those television networks..  I got the same TV shows on Seattle's Channel 4 as on Buffalo's Channel 7..  It was amazing how many TV station's ABC owned.

1976cadillaccoupedeville_2Several years later when one of our local stations switched from ABC to CBS and later when the UHF station with old movies changed over to become a part of the new FOX network it dawned on me that the networks didn't "own" those local stations at all..  The Building, antenna, airwaves were owned by the rich guy in town driving the shiny new Cadillac.  He just syndicated the programming as a network affiliate.

All these memories came back to me this morning after reading this story in Forbes:

http://www.forbes.com/technology/2007/10/21/myspace-internet-viacom-tech-cx_eb_1022myspace.html

The web networks of today are experimenting with TV programming of their own and it dawned on me that domain name owners are in a similar position as the TV station owners to syndicate programming as it comes down the pipe.

The owner of the name RoomMates.com is in a terrific position to add a link to the new made for myspace show, in exchange for a fee or a share of advertising revenues.  The large portfolio holder with hundreds or thousands of room-mate or apartment related domain names is in an even better position.  Rather than one TV station with pre-set programming..  the net and large portfolios of names are in a better position to distribute and syndicate programming to the consumer than a single site that somebody might not stumble across..  On the other hand you could also distribute links to new web programming instantly across hundreds of thousands of domains of any genre based on the demographics of viewers across your name network, or based on the release time of your web based show.

There are several ways to peel this onion, but as Myspace or potentially Facebook and others create more "shows" launched via the web, those with the disposable eyeballs will be in a terrific position carry the message and distribute the content.

Hmmm  now where can I get traffic out of nowhere?.. Sounds like generic domain name owners to me. Keep marshaling those eyeballs.

October 21, 2007

Bob Guccione Jr. Lays an Egg .. for Discover Media

SaharAs reported on Sahar's blog:

http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=537

It appears Bob Guccione Jr. has sold Discover Media's website address:

Quote: "While most print companies are desperately trying to become multi-platform companies, Discover Media sold off its discover.com Web address to Discover Card for about $5 million."

Not buying an obvious generic name is one thing ...but selling your existing address to raise cash is poison ...  Particularly so if you're in the "publishing" business.

Now his company gets to rebrand, recreate search engine links and reputation ..  old archived stories would have to be republished and re-indexed.  Quite a potential mess depending on how active the discover.com domain was.

This is the equivalent of having the gold in the palm of your had and giving it away because you didn't understand what you had. Completely foolish.

October 20, 2007

Names That Mean a Lot of Different Things, For Different Reasons, to Different People

7mileDan writes: "Seven Mile bridge in the FL keys.. Thanks again for chatting last Monday.  Have a wonderful weekend..

Dan"

***FS*** Thanks to you Dan... this timely pic again illustrates what many of us in the domain industry intimately understand .. Generic domain names and name-phrases often have a great deal of meaning and desirability to different people..  and for many different reasons.

Skidmark could be something you lay down from behind the wheel of your CL 65, it could be something unfortunate in your Calvins, or it could be the name of that hot new alternative band.

Delta could be an airline, a reciprocating saw, or a frat-house..

United could be an airline, a moving company or any number of insurers.

Doll House could be something children have played with for 300 years..  or a registered trademark related to beer cozies in certain countries or jurisdictions.

The most contentious disputes relating to domain names usually surround these coveted generic words and phrases which have some combination of potency, meaning, B-Factor, and Je Nai se Quoi.

Railroad_baronsThe existing owners of such .com words and phrases, sometimes find themselves living modern-day scenes from a wild-west movie -- similar to the turning point where ranch owners are run roughshod over by railroad barons who's tracks came a few years later than those homesteaders.

The two-fold difference between 'then' and 'now' is the knowledge of those former inequities..  "We've seen this picture before"..   and .. today's ranchers have more free cash-flow than their bean-farming predecessors. Today's domain registrants are armed with lawyers, guns and money of their own; and while not walking around with a chip on their shoulder, they are willing and able to challenge covetous latecomers effectively via the UDRP and the courts.

Most of these accidental virtual-barons have vision exceeding their railroading counterparts.

This past weeks example of Cowboys.com drove that home for me..  After the attorney for the Dallas Cowboys came down with a case of "buyers remorse" relating to his $225,000 bid for that generic and valuable URL, his unpaid bid was bested by $100,000 (implying several groups of bidders) after word of the default spread to the street (NB: I had no hand in this).

Running_away_from_your_bid..Less known is the fact that at the previous Las Vegas TRAFFIC auction a bidder dropped his paddle and physically ran from the room after facing the winning bid for a name he couldn't afford.  Another domainer chased that dead-beat out of the building in order to "buy" his winning bid at a premium!! -- because "that" gent couldn't get his own much higher bid in in-time. 

It's this flash mob of hot-money and domain visionaries with wallets to match their cajones that showed me where the future of Internet media may lie. The domainer who can afford to beat all would-be comers. I'm impressed by those top tier investor registrants who aren't in this business to pump and dump their own portfolios like many new registries..  They're here to acquire your portfolio and consolidate the industry on the way to becoming the next great media franchise.

I believe the great media companies of tomorrow will have significant path-changing entanglements with some of today's domainers..  Imagine 10 years of Google traffic payments and what you could do with that collective capital, coupled with interest and leverage from ongoing cashflow/operations.  Imagine 30-60 million curious walk-by visits a month from generic names that you aren't ashamed to mention publicly.

He who has the gold makes the rules.. has always seemed like a crass statement of sorts to me..  but there may be some truth in that statement as it relates to domain ownership.. If you own a generic URL, you own the gold .. or the Internet equivalent. How's that you ask?

People aren't naturally pre-disposed to beat a path to cynthiasdollhouseemporium.com ..  they're "inclined" to visit dollhouse.com; and they aren't visiting myskidmark.com, they're visiting skidmark.com; and they aren't visiting hot-las-vegas-travel.com ..they're visiting travellasvegas.com.  It doesn't matter how many domain names get created, because only a certain percentage will ever get "organic" type-in traffic for the keyword weight, resonance or "gravity" of the generic name itself. Disposable looky-loo drive-by visitors that you can monetize without consequence or degradation to the visitor stream.  And if you own those names..  then you own that portion of the Internet..  well, the generic disposable traffic on the Internet anyway -- which is the Internet that's worth talking about.  Because if you own "that traffic" and you make a mistake with your hot software mousetrap or execution, you get a redo with even more free traffic.. It's an opportunity without a shelf-life, and a parting gift in the form of break-up value to the name itself.

Free-form food for thought. Take the next week off if you already knew this stuff.

Department of Commerce Renews .US Contract with Neustar

Usa_2 http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/press/2007/Neustar_101907.html

Trademark Law- What Search Marketers Should Know

Equity http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3627333

This is a topic that all domain registrants and paid-search marketers should familiarise themselves with.