Friends and Family

October 26, 2007

The Free Internet .. Domain Names as 'Your' Platform

SaharSahar writes:

"Here’s a domain-parking related post on Mashable I found interesting… how parked pages are perceived by non domainers: Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/ Thanks!" "

***FS***  Sahar is correct of course..  Everything in life is a matter of perception or a gradient-optic through which you view things. Create a domain name and point it to your registrar's placeholder page and the name is "unused" ..  add advertising of your own and the name is "parked"..  Heaven forbid your inactive domain with advertising gets indexed into almighty Google..  If this happens by accident or design, you've unwittingly created the sinister sounding "Spam page" .. Point your spam page to another website to make money from those visitors and the name becomes "inactive". At least in some peoples eyes.  Never have so many "inactive" domains made so much, for so many active entrepreneurs.

Life is full of labels and when you're Google and your mission is the domination of Internet search, navigation and online user behavior, then it serves you well to create labels which empower you and weaken those who could challenge you.

I like Google the search utility a great deal, but I am  less than enamored with Google the marketing machine and businessman.  Google has managed to convince the world it does no wrong. It is a "happy fun ball of love" :) Not true of course. Google creates what business people perceive as great wrongs each day, but sells the masses on the fact that those wrongs are either not occurring or justified in the name of a greater Google.

Quote: ""...For Google’s part, the reason these sites are being slammed is because the company’s policy tells web publishers to “avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web.” Do some of the effected blogs sell links to such sites? Perhaps; we’ll let these folks defend themselves and their practices. But the real story is the hypocrisy of Google enforcing this policy on third-party publishers, when within their own engine they profit immensely by selling ads to spammers and so-called “bad neighborhoods.”"

Reading this I was reminded of the gent Vern told me about who attended a recent SES show.  This gent was practically in tears that his livelihood was wiped out after his site was scrubbed from Google's index, and he couldn't for the life of him get an answer or explanation as to what he had done wrong. Google giveth and Google taketh away..  When Google giveth it is your best friend.. But it's really sad to watch the "Google taketh away part" as Verno described it. People starting over..  but not knowing why or where to begin.

""Of course what Google was really doing was playing politics. Better than most, I might add. Sans the lobbyists and open debates, Google was working the people. Price controls? No, Google doesn’t control prices. Google measures quality, and adjusts pricing based on quality scores."" ...  Reading this quote Danno sent from Johnon's blog really struck me... 

As a domainer I get the majority of my traffic from "outside the Google framework". Google knows my sites exist but for the most part they work to actively deny visitors typing the domains I own (at Google) from ever finding my website in their search results.  I exist on the "Free Internet", you can navigate to me in your address bar because I run a real website.  But to believe Google's marketing machine, I reside in the "Bad neighborhoods" of the net. Why else couldn't you find me?  Because my sites advertising made me too much money for Google's liking?  Because I was displaying a Google competitor's ads?

You see Google knows my websites contain advertising. They hypocritically take visitors trying to navigate to my "bad neighborhood" and show show results with different advertising or content... In their view, this 'sleight of hand' miraculously gentrifies the Internet.

Luckily for me, Google only takes the dumbest and laziest of my visitors.  Millions of people say "screw this". Google won't give me the site I really want so I'll just head to my trusty address bar and leave 'the Google' for the site I really wanted. It's frustrating for users, but a necessary frustration that reinforces to users that the authoritative way to locate a website is via the browser,  not 'the Google'.

Plenty of others have been brainwashed into viewing the net the way Google wants them to. Tens of thousands of the Internet's brightest dutifully attend SES, they leave friends, family, loved ones - They miss life's important moments so they can serve the Google. When I look out across the floor of a show like SES, I see a group of people who have largely abandoned the Free Internet in favor of being a servant to the Google.

Remember that guy crying about his lost livelihood at SES?  Everybody attending that conference is "that guy" ..  like the car wreck you pass on your way home during rush hour..  That could have been you. Every person who ignores organic domain name traffic and embraces Google alone is basically selling themselves into a lifetime of servitude..  You are beholden to Google to get your traffic forever. God help you if they turn on you.

I guess a lot of this post is common sense with a bit of bluster.  Buy into another party's "platform" and live and die by "their" platform. Things could be worse I suppose. You can learn the "new smart pricing tricks" in 6-9 months..  and "quality adjustments" can be mastered in another 6 months.. as you gray, dancing to the tune Google plays for you, their black-box ensures that Google's house will always win.  Your revenue will remain flat, theirs won't. You will feel like an entrepreneur, but in the end, "you" work for "them".

Well good luck to you my SEO friends. If you're looking for me, I'll be on the Free Internet..  Buying generic names like Scott Day's DiamondsDirect.com ..  logical sounding generic domains.. I have opted out of the Google traffic generator in favor of creating sites for the 20 or 30 visitors who find their way to names like that each day.  The more sites you acquire the greater the trickle of traffic you get.  Buy enough and the trickle becomes a torrent. You can arbitrage traffic from Google (when they let you) and increasingly from other reliable traffic sources such as Microsoft, Facebook or traditional media in order to sell products, sales leads and other advertising.

When you own a generic domain name you join the Free Internet.. I encourage you to stake your own claim here and release the chains that bend your perception. Long Live the Free Internet.

October 22, 2007

Unlocking the Latent Value of Domain Names

SaharGreat posts today on Sahar's blog:

From Registration Fee To Millions..

Sahar links hope and inspiration to the affordable aspect of domain names, and the ensuing possibilities related to them as cornerstones for many things.

Josh says: Sahar is a smart cookie.
http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=545

[and]

Every Strong Generic Domain Is a Million Dollars+ Property.

Sahar reflects on the present, and peers into the future. The power and importance of language and words is becoming magnified by the web. Think of a word.  Type it in. Whammo.
http://www.conceptualist.com/?p=544

October 20, 2007

Castello Brothers Give Thumbs-up to T.R.A.F.F.I.C East 2007

3hamdavidschillingmichael_2Josh sends link: ""Forbes, Ham and Schilling mentioned in first paragraph. They also use the word ballyhooed in their article.""

http://www.associatedcities.com/news.php?newsID=132

***FS*** It's not just these guys 'way with words' that makes them fascinating.  Nice guys, muscians, businessmen; upbeat, glass-half-full entrepreneurs -- the world needs people like this.

October 19, 2007

Friends from the Island Write..

Friends from the island write:

""Hi Frank, Remember us, the Swedes?.. We surely remember you guys. I read your blog on Google today and I had to send you this dilbert…

Googlebert ***FS*** Thanks so much for sending this Thomas!  Very funny!!~ Owning a portfolio of type-in traffic domain names may not help you get in the Google index but it is a little like owning a "giant mirror" in case the death ray starts to point in your general direction...  Thanks again for your note and the relevant yet unsettling cartoon  ;)

October 17, 2007

Aaron Wall Spots Google Typo Fixing of URL Search Queries in The Searchbox

Aaron writes:

Aaron""Hi Frank,

Hope you are doing well. I am still overseas, but thought you might be interested in how Google is spell correcting some domain name and filepath spelling errors. http://www.seobook.com/google-corrects-domain-name-spelling-errors

They dont fix .nt or .xom, but they directed an seibook.com/bok query to seobook.com/blog !

seibook.com/book is a real URL, only 1 character away from that URL causes google to point to my domain while changing a character in the domain name and 3 in the filename.""

***FS*** Goog This type of stuff can backfire for the obvious "confusion issues" you touch on Aaron. Google acting as the arbiter, deciding which site you want, based on ancillary information you give it..  Type seibook.com in the Google search box and the algo results spit back the requested seibook.com site (for me in Cayman anyway)..  Give Google more information such as the /blog filepath after the URL and Google thinks the user is looking for Aaron's site because it knows that seibook.com/blog isn't indexed or doesn't exist.

I think this gradual shaping of navigation will eventually creep into address bar navigation..  That could reignite browser competition... and combined with higher registry renewal prices will cause lots of longer tail "tasting acquired" portfolios to start dying off.  Expect a lot more name deletions in 2008-2009 ..  partly based on the economy (speculative chaff jettisoned) and partly based of changes like these.

That said, this only works so far. History has shown, you can't cage the user...  Throw up too many blockades, detours and roadblocks to user intent and people will abandon your platform. I am living proof of that statement as we get almost 100% of our traffic from around Google..  Google sends us nothing -- effectively no traffic, yet all our visitors are Google users.. That's a lot of disgruntled customers who are forced to leave Google, finding their way to our front door by avoiding the natural path (through Google).  If Google stopped the gaming their search results, allowing Domain Name searches in their search box to resolve or at least show the actual site requested, our traffic would spike significantly..  I don't expect the cold war against direct navigation to stop anytime soon ...  but a fellow can always hope.. and take comfort in the fact that Google, Microsoft and all navigation helpers can game and cajole as they wish..  People will find their way to the 'free Internet'..  (the site they actually want) eventually.

Everytime I post on this subject it reminds me of the great quote by Gandhi:

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you; then you win!"

For the longest time Search engines ignored domains..  and later some (not all) search operators laughed at the domain name navigation concept, ridiculing it as "Grandma Navigation" .. well the fact that Google runs a registrar, a domain parking program and aggressively shapes domain searches in the Google searchbox, illustrates to me that they have decided to fight (or at least try to control) some forms of domain navigation.

I look forward to the day when every domain name correctly entered into the Google search-box will reward the user with a link to the site they request.  If you love your users Google,  set them free. :)

Ask And You Shall Receive

Eric McFadden taught me a valuable lesson this past TRAFFIC conference.  I gave Eric a ticket to the show, said ticket provided to me by a colleague who couldn't make the event himself.

http://intangibleproperties.com/Frank-Schilling.htm

Eric walked the conference floor, met people, attended the break-out sessions and learned a great deal about the domain industry, all because he had the courage to "ask" for that ticket and step out of his comfort zone to attend the show.

Our industry is one populated with many introverts..  I am much more comfortable staying in than being out, so I know the emotion. ..  Try to step out of your comfort zone each day..  Eric did and he's much richer for it.

Hazy Flashbacks From TRAFFIC

Da_clubSouth Beach Club was Bangin'

Chad_and_friendsIt really doesn't suck to be Chad FolkeningRollin_with_my_homies

This shot needs Vern.

Schilling_and_ferber6 hours before heading home..  Colleague John Ferber is much less rough and has a much more even tan..

October 16, 2007

3 Tuesday Links from Josh

Yahoo and traffic quality.  changes coming?
http://www.ysmblog.com/blog/2007/10/01/driving-traffic-quality/

open source platform.  medsphere.
(thinking of your health site/health traffic)
http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9797889-16.html?tag=nefd.blgs

Porn spammers get 5 yrs in jail.  (usa)
http://blogs.pcworld.com/staffblog/archives/005687.html

October 01, 2007

2 Tix to TRAFFIC

A colleague has booked 5 passes to the TRAFFIC conference and will only be using 3 of them,  so if you would like to attend the event and couldn't afford to previously, this could be your golden opportunity. 

Please send me a private comment and I will connect you with the passes owner.  Please,  only those who couldn't afford to attend and wanted to need apply..  Don't ask for these tickets if you could easily afford to pay your own way.

***FS***  Thanks sincerely..  and congrats to Rick Clemmer - and - Eric McFadden   who are going to the show.

September 17, 2007

Jay's Blog

Terrific posts on Jay's blog last two days relating to whois privacy and (unrelated) Matt Cutts over at Google.  Nice stuff homey.