Google

October 26, 2007

The Free Internet .. Domain Names as 'Your' Platform

SaharSahar writes:

"Here’s a domain-parking related post on Mashable I found interesting… how parked pages are perceived by non domainers: Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/ Thanks!" "

***FS***  Sahar is correct of course..  Everything in life is a matter of perception or a gradient-optic through which you view things. Create a domain name and point it to your registrar's placeholder page and the name is "unused" ..  add advertising of your own and the name is "parked"..  Heaven forbid your inactive domain with advertising gets indexed into almighty Google..  If this happens by accident or design, you've unwittingly created the sinister sounding "Spam page" .. Point your spam page to another website to make money from those visitors and the name becomes "inactive". At least in some peoples eyes.  Never have so many "inactive" domains made so much, for so many active entrepreneurs.

Life is full of labels and when you're Google and your mission is the domination of Internet search, navigation and online user behavior, then it serves you well to create labels which empower you and weaken those who could challenge you.

I like Google the search utility a great deal, but I am  less than enamored with Google the marketing machine and businessman.  Google has managed to convince the world it does no wrong. It is a "happy fun ball of love" :) Not true of course. Google creates what business people perceive as great wrongs each day, but sells the masses on the fact that those wrongs are either not occurring or justified in the name of a greater Google.

Quote: ""...For Google’s part, the reason these sites are being slammed is because the company’s policy tells web publishers to “avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web.” Do some of the effected blogs sell links to such sites? Perhaps; we’ll let these folks defend themselves and their practices. But the real story is the hypocrisy of Google enforcing this policy on third-party publishers, when within their own engine they profit immensely by selling ads to spammers and so-called “bad neighborhoods.”"

Reading this I was reminded of the gent Vern told me about who attended a recent SES show.  This gent was practically in tears that his livelihood was wiped out after his site was scrubbed from Google's index, and he couldn't for the life of him get an answer or explanation as to what he had done wrong. Google giveth and Google taketh away..  When Google giveth it is your best friend.. But it's really sad to watch the "Google taketh away part" as Verno described it. People starting over..  but not knowing why or where to begin.

""Of course what Google was really doing was playing politics. Better than most, I might add. Sans the lobbyists and open debates, Google was working the people. Price controls? No, Google doesn’t control prices. Google measures quality, and adjusts pricing based on quality scores."" ...  Reading this quote Danno sent from Johnon's blog really struck me... 

As a domainer I get the majority of my traffic from "outside the Google framework". Google knows my sites exist but for the most part they work to actively deny visitors typing the domains I own (at Google) from ever finding my website in their search results.  I exist on the "Free Internet", you can navigate to me in your address bar because I run a real website.  But to believe Google's marketing machine, I reside in the "Bad neighborhoods" of the net. Why else couldn't you find me?  Because my sites advertising made me too much money for Google's liking?  Because I was displaying a Google competitor's ads?

You see Google knows my websites contain advertising. They hypocritically take visitors trying to navigate to my "bad neighborhood" and show show results with different advertising or content... In their view, this 'sleight of hand' miraculously gentrifies the Internet.

Luckily for me, Google only takes the dumbest and laziest of my visitors.  Millions of people say "screw this". Google won't give me the site I really want so I'll just head to my trusty address bar and leave 'the Google' for the site I really wanted. It's frustrating for users, but a necessary frustration that reinforces to users that the authoritative way to locate a website is via the browser,  not 'the Google'.

Plenty of others have been brainwashed into viewing the net the way Google wants them to. Tens of thousands of the Internet's brightest dutifully attend SES, they leave friends, family, loved ones - They miss life's important moments so they can serve the Google. When I look out across the floor of a show like SES, I see a group of people who have largely abandoned the Free Internet in favor of being a servant to the Google.

Remember that guy crying about his lost livelihood at SES?  Everybody attending that conference is "that guy" ..  like the car wreck you pass on your way home during rush hour..  That could have been you. Every person who ignores organic domain name traffic and embraces Google alone is basically selling themselves into a lifetime of servitude..  You are beholden to Google to get your traffic forever. God help you if they turn on you.

I guess a lot of this post is common sense with a bit of bluster.  Buy into another party's "platform" and live and die by "their" platform. Things could be worse I suppose. You can learn the "new smart pricing tricks" in 6-9 months..  and "quality adjustments" can be mastered in another 6 months.. as you gray, dancing to the tune Google plays for you, their black-box ensures that Google's house will always win.  Your revenue will remain flat, theirs won't. You will feel like an entrepreneur, but in the end, "you" work for "them".

Well good luck to you my SEO friends. If you're looking for me, I'll be on the Free Internet..  Buying generic names like Scott Day's DiamondsDirect.com ..  logical sounding generic domains.. I have opted out of the Google traffic generator in favor of creating sites for the 20 or 30 visitors who find their way to names like that each day.  The more sites you acquire the greater the trickle of traffic you get.  Buy enough and the trickle becomes a torrent. You can arbitrage traffic from Google (when they let you) and increasingly from other reliable traffic sources such as Microsoft, Facebook or traditional media in order to sell products, sales leads and other advertising.

When you own a generic domain name you join the Free Internet.. I encourage you to stake your own claim here and release the chains that bend your perception. Long Live the Free Internet.

October 22, 2007

A Search Engine .. Powered by Millions of Domain Names

Danno writes:

Danno"Hi,

If there ever was a time in human history for a few 'domainers' and a few 'seo'ers/sem'ers' that understand domains and Internet search...to come together.

Now would be the time to for a "Field of Dreams" moment... 'build it and they will come'.

___

Dogpile Beats Google, Again Top Search Engine in Customer Satisfaction
http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2007/10/18/dogpile-beats-google-again-top-search-engine-in-customer-satisfaction/

Peace!
Dan"

***FS***  A bunch of domain registrants plumbing their traffic from countless individual names to the results page realting to the name's subject matter within the search engine.  Type eatingdisorders.com and get to Dogpile results for "eating disorders"  ..  Not a bad idea Danno..  but if you really think about it,  we already have that in the form of Google..  GOOG gets millions of unique visits each day to their domainpark syndication channel from domains like yours and mine  ;) ..  still this engine would be owned by the domain registrants .. a co-op..  I like the idea..  but it's hard to align interests. Great idea Danno.

October 19, 2007

Friends from the Island Write..

Friends from the island write:

""Hi Frank, Remember us, the Swedes?.. We surely remember you guys. I read your blog on Google today and I had to send you this dilbert…

Googlebert ***FS*** Thanks so much for sending this Thomas!  Very funny!!~ Owning a portfolio of type-in traffic domain names may not help you get in the Google index but it is a little like owning a "giant mirror" in case the death ray starts to point in your general direction...  Thanks again for your note and the relevant yet unsettling cartoon  ;)

Google's quarterly profit hits 46%.

http://www.news.com/Google-quarterly-profit-swells-46-percent/2100-1030_3-6214246.html?tag=nefd.top

Goog_2***FS*** Thank-you black-box, smart-pricing and "cost of services." ..  Sheesh .. 

Google: Complete Chaos Orbiting A Golden Goose?

Goog http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9800095-7.html

Quote: What do 16,000 people do at Google? "Half the company has been hired in the last 12 months. That's chaotic," he says. "The new employees find it difficult to figure out how to get things done. It's not a normal company."

Golden_goose_was_here ***FS***  Jordan Rohan has my favorite quote which is balls-on accurate: ""They have possibly the best core business in the history of the Internet, That is supporting them as they attempt to find an Act II.""  I've had several historical Googlers tell me that many of the original staff have tried to land jobs with Facebook.  16000 people vs Less than 400 leaves lots of headroom for potential options and upside.

October 18, 2007

Great Comment By Ben Wilks re Google and Domains

Goog""I have friends that only use Google search box for direct navigation. Why? Because it's faster and if they stuff up Google will fix it. This is how a lot of people use the web. Domainers need to start abusing this. I watched my mate do it last night, his comment was a. it's faster b. I want to start at Google, that's why it's MY homepage. Fair enough I say.

Site's that don't rank for their own name are VERY RARELY banned. It is actually quite difficult to get a site banned. I know guys that do all the time. Sites that don't rank just don't have the links coming in from the right places.

It's not rocket science and one good paid link (or free from your own network) can rank the domain top 10 - #1, it's not hard hey.

So if your sites are not ranking for their names you are missing half the pie and it's only going to get worse.

A BIG factor of the Google algo is AGE OF LINKS. The sooner you act the better. In some niches you will be left behind.

I also understand it's WORK to the domainers, but at the same time it's not that much extra if your systems are smart. READ: it can be automated. The ROI is there and it's not difficult with a network of sites that are indexed or have link pop.

Food for thought anyway.""

***FS***  Well said Ben..  I'm sure we've all noticed friends and fam who navigate in this way.. We could all take some of your advice.

October 17, 2007

Aaron Wall Spots Google Typo Fixing of URL Search Queries in The Searchbox

Aaron writes:

Aaron""Hi Frank,

Hope you are doing well. I am still overseas, but thought you might be interested in how Google is spell correcting some domain name and filepath spelling errors. http://www.seobook.com/google-corrects-domain-name-spelling-errors

They dont fix .nt or .xom, but they directed an seibook.com/bok query to seobook.com/blog !

seibook.com/book is a real URL, only 1 character away from that URL causes google to point to my domain while changing a character in the domain name and 3 in the filename.""

***FS*** Goog This type of stuff can backfire for the obvious "confusion issues" you touch on Aaron. Google acting as the arbiter, deciding which site you want, based on ancillary information you give it..  Type seibook.com in the Google search box and the algo results spit back the requested seibook.com site (for me in Cayman anyway)..  Give Google more information such as the /blog filepath after the URL and Google thinks the user is looking for Aaron's site because it knows that seibook.com/blog isn't indexed or doesn't exist.

I think this gradual shaping of navigation will eventually creep into address bar navigation..  That could reignite browser competition... and combined with higher registry renewal prices will cause lots of longer tail "tasting acquired" portfolios to start dying off.  Expect a lot more name deletions in 2008-2009 ..  partly based on the economy (speculative chaff jettisoned) and partly based of changes like these.

That said, this only works so far. History has shown, you can't cage the user...  Throw up too many blockades, detours and roadblocks to user intent and people will abandon your platform. I am living proof of that statement as we get almost 100% of our traffic from around Google..  Google sends us nothing -- effectively no traffic, yet all our visitors are Google users.. That's a lot of disgruntled customers who are forced to leave Google, finding their way to our front door by avoiding the natural path (through Google).  If Google stopped the gaming their search results, allowing Domain Name searches in their search box to resolve or at least show the actual site requested, our traffic would spike significantly..  I don't expect the cold war against direct navigation to stop anytime soon ...  but a fellow can always hope.. and take comfort in the fact that Google, Microsoft and all navigation helpers can game and cajole as they wish..  People will find their way to the 'free Internet'..  (the site they actually want) eventually.

Everytime I post on this subject it reminds me of the great quote by Gandhi:

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you; then you win!"

For the longest time Search engines ignored domains..  and later some (not all) search operators laughed at the domain name navigation concept, ridiculing it as "Grandma Navigation" .. well the fact that Google runs a registrar, a domain parking program and aggressively shapes domain searches in the Google searchbox, illustrates to me that they have decided to fight (or at least try to control) some forms of domain navigation.

I look forward to the day when every domain name correctly entered into the Google search-box will reward the user with a link to the site they request.  If you love your users Google,  set them free. :)

October 13, 2007

Smoke Mirrors and Deception

Josh comments on Johnon.com/Michael Gilmour..  His thoughts posted raw and unfiltered..  except for heading, courtesy of me..  Smoke and mirrors never last tho ..  Cream always rises, truth always finds a way to show.

http://www.johnon.com/417/domainer-profits.html

""Domainer profit margins: Michael Gilmour of WhizzBangsBlog.com knows his business. He presented numbers (I love to see numbers) on Google's traffic acuisition costs and the percentage of ad revenue shared between Google, domainers, and parking companies.

Guess what? Google¹s share has gone down (-29%), domainer¹s have basically stayed the same (-3%), and parking companies revenues have increased around 45% (since Q4 2005).

Google¹s share has gone down (-29%), domainer¹s have basically stayed the same (-3%), and parking companies revenues have increased around 45% (since Q4 2005). I think you get my point.  :)

My prediction:

Some very smart person or group of people is going to set up a transparent and very well run "parking" company that will disrupt the current situation in a significant way. My guess is this company will offer variances of parked pages, real mini-sites and Transparent Accounting to those who park their domains with them.

Lastly, this company will take a much lower revenue share than other parked companies, and domainers with Traffic will stampede towards them.""

***FS*** I'll go one better..  the parking company that acts as the disruptive conduit upsetting the apple cart rev-share will be domainer centric. I have watched so many parking co's come and go..  Many "get" this biz but many don't..  A significant percentage of present day domain parking co's play a combination game of "keepway", "watch the competition then react" and "I think I've got something really special that nobody else does..  but I'm wrong"  All those games eventually blow away amid disruptive competitive actions.

October 05, 2007

Is Google Broken?

Goog http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/10/03/is-google-broken.aspx

AristotleThis grabber headline by Rick Aristotle Munarriz leads into a story which observes that several of Google's partners are stumbling: MIVA, Answers...

Quote: "Google arms third-party publishers with industry-leading monetization tools, but for those publishers, it's strictly BYOE -- bring your own eyeballs.... Answers.com has been sprinkling its reference pages with Google ads since 2005... Again, the Answers.com slump isn't a reflection on the quality of Google as a monetizing genius. The company conceded at the time that its site traffic was off by 28%, due mostly to a change in Google's search-engine algorithms... "

So the message is, if you get your traffic from Google, don't try to monetize there ..  If you become too successful, Google's algorithmic search side will scrub your pages from their index.. Then they'll rotate other relevant publishers into your position... all in the name of keeping Google's front-door search users happy.

Quote: "So we shouldn't assume that weakness at Google's partners spells weakness at Big G itself."

Sacrificial_lamb .. As a publisher, I've always viewed Google as a bit of a predator in this context..  taking publishers in, convincing them to serve Google ads, and then allowing those publishers to toil for Google, working sites into their algo to serve the beast, all for increasing revenues, finally to have Google's algorithm scrub you from the index if you become too successful at punching ad converting pages to the top..  Good publishers take on the role of sacrificial lamb to show the algo guys where the holes are and they get to ride the express elevator to the street as a reward.

As Aristotle points out.. The publishers who do best at Google are those with high quality content and no ads at all (Wikipedia) or those who deliver quality non-Google originating traffic to Google's ad marketplace (domain names).  If Google could find a way to chew and spit those parties in the name of a better Google, it would.

October 02, 2007

So It Begins...

GoogLately I've noticed that the results at Google are not as good as they used to be.  SEO experts have been getting better and better at breaking higher into Big G's search results with ad-only pages. At first I thought it was just me who noticed, then I read this: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/01/google_spam_infiltration/

All great Search utilities have ultimately succumbed to SEO pages.. Excite, AltaVista, Webcrawler..  The crushing weight of all comers wanting into the algo.  It's hard to stop the tide..  Google has held the beach for a long time but the tide is beginning to turn.

This is ultimately good for domain names as a higher percentage of disenfranchised Google users opt out of the search-engine framework to simply type the domain name versions of their searches into the browser address bar. Even I've been typing more search query style domains lately and I've been pleasantly surprised by the higher quality of domain name pages and small websites than I saw just a few short years ago.

The evolution is palpable...  to me anyway.