The Power of the Internet

October 26, 2007

The Free Internet .. Domain Names as 'Your' Platform

SaharSahar writes:

"Here’s a domain-parking related post on Mashable I found interesting… how parked pages are perceived by non domainers: Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/ Thanks!" "

***FS***  Sahar is correct of course..  Everything in life is a matter of perception or a gradient-optic through which you view things. Create a domain name and point it to your registrar's placeholder page and the name is "unused" ..  add advertising of your own and the name is "parked"..  Heaven forbid your inactive domain with advertising gets indexed into almighty Google..  If this happens by accident or design, you've unwittingly created the sinister sounding "Spam page" .. Point your spam page to another website to make money from those visitors and the name becomes "inactive". At least in some peoples eyes.  Never have so many "inactive" domains made so much, for so many active entrepreneurs.

Life is full of labels and when you're Google and your mission is the domination of Internet search, navigation and online user behavior, then it serves you well to create labels which empower you and weaken those who could challenge you.

I like Google the search utility a great deal, but I am  less than enamored with Google the marketing machine and businessman.  Google has managed to convince the world it does no wrong. It is a "happy fun ball of love" :) Not true of course. Google creates what business people perceive as great wrongs each day, but sells the masses on the fact that those wrongs are either not occurring or justified in the name of a greater Google.

Quote: ""...For Google’s part, the reason these sites are being slammed is because the company’s policy tells web publishers to “avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web.” Do some of the effected blogs sell links to such sites? Perhaps; we’ll let these folks defend themselves and their practices. But the real story is the hypocrisy of Google enforcing this policy on third-party publishers, when within their own engine they profit immensely by selling ads to spammers and so-called “bad neighborhoods.”"

Reading this I was reminded of the gent Vern told me about who attended a recent SES show.  This gent was practically in tears that his livelihood was wiped out after his site was scrubbed from Google's index, and he couldn't for the life of him get an answer or explanation as to what he had done wrong. Google giveth and Google taketh away..  When Google giveth it is your best friend.. But it's really sad to watch the "Google taketh away part" as Verno described it. People starting over..  but not knowing why or where to begin.

""Of course what Google was really doing was playing politics. Better than most, I might add. Sans the lobbyists and open debates, Google was working the people. Price controls? No, Google doesn’t control prices. Google measures quality, and adjusts pricing based on quality scores."" ...  Reading this quote Danno sent from Johnon's blog really struck me... 

As a domainer I get the majority of my traffic from "outside the Google framework". Google knows my sites exist but for the most part they work to actively deny visitors typing the domains I own (at Google) from ever finding my website in their search results.  I exist on the "Free Internet", you can navigate to me in your address bar because I run a real website.  But to believe Google's marketing machine, I reside in the "Bad neighborhoods" of the net. Why else couldn't you find me?  Because my sites advertising made me too much money for Google's liking?  Because I was displaying a Google competitor's ads?

You see Google knows my websites contain advertising. They hypocritically take visitors trying to navigate to my "bad neighborhood" and show show results with different advertising or content... In their view, this 'sleight of hand' miraculously gentrifies the Internet.

Luckily for me, Google only takes the dumbest and laziest of my visitors.  Millions of people say "screw this". Google won't give me the site I really want so I'll just head to my trusty address bar and leave 'the Google' for the site I really wanted. It's frustrating for users, but a necessary frustration that reinforces to users that the authoritative way to locate a website is via the browser,  not 'the Google'.

Plenty of others have been brainwashed into viewing the net the way Google wants them to. Tens of thousands of the Internet's brightest dutifully attend SES, they leave friends, family, loved ones - They miss life's important moments so they can serve the Google. When I look out across the floor of a show like SES, I see a group of people who have largely abandoned the Free Internet in favor of being a servant to the Google.

Remember that guy crying about his lost livelihood at SES?  Everybody attending that conference is "that guy" ..  like the car wreck you pass on your way home during rush hour..  That could have been you. Every person who ignores organic domain name traffic and embraces Google alone is basically selling themselves into a lifetime of servitude..  You are beholden to Google to get your traffic forever. God help you if they turn on you.

I guess a lot of this post is common sense with a bit of bluster.  Buy into another party's "platform" and live and die by "their" platform. Things could be worse I suppose. You can learn the "new smart pricing tricks" in 6-9 months..  and "quality adjustments" can be mastered in another 6 months.. as you gray, dancing to the tune Google plays for you, their black-box ensures that Google's house will always win.  Your revenue will remain flat, theirs won't. You will feel like an entrepreneur, but in the end, "you" work for "them".

Well good luck to you my SEO friends. If you're looking for me, I'll be on the Free Internet..  Buying generic names like Scott Day's DiamondsDirect.com ..  logical sounding generic domains.. I have opted out of the Google traffic generator in favor of creating sites for the 20 or 30 visitors who find their way to names like that each day.  The more sites you acquire the greater the trickle of traffic you get.  Buy enough and the trickle becomes a torrent. You can arbitrage traffic from Google (when they let you) and increasingly from other reliable traffic sources such as Microsoft, Facebook or traditional media in order to sell products, sales leads and other advertising.

When you own a generic domain name you join the Free Internet.. I encourage you to stake your own claim here and release the chains that bend your perception. Long Live the Free Internet.

October 25, 2007

The "Real" Reason Sites Like Facebook.com are Worth Billions

You_love_the_internet A new poll shows that nearly 1 in 4 Americans say the Internet could be a stand-in for a significant other for a period of time

http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9804144-7.html

Josh says: "Many people really really really like the Net. (Isn't it fun to state the obvious.)"

***FS***  Yes it is brother Josh  :)

October 24, 2007

Microsoft Values Facebook at 15 billion.. Domains Name Valuations in a Bubble

Facebook http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ah_myY3uN0pE&refer=home

I am consistently dumbstruck that deals like this barely raise an eyebrow, while individual domain names, the foundational elements of the Internet, get compared to tulip manias and bubbles.

It's a strange upside down world we live in.. Domain name monetization has been going on in much the same way since adult webmasters began selling monthly memberships to porn sites in 1995 (3 years after the birth of the modern web browser) ..  Today we have paid search monetization sites for virtually every product and service under the sun. Many are moving away from straight parking toward lead generation, arbitrage, content delivery and pay-per-unique implementations.

But these simple sites which for years have made money in the most benign of ways are 'bubbles' while the publicly listed internet economy, consisting of plates spinning on the ends of pool cues is accepted as foundationally sound and airtight.

All a fellow can do is smile, shrug and keep cashing those checks. It's too tiring and unproductive to pen a counterpoint to each person who don't understand.. or who doesn't want to understand.

Suffice it to say that the Internet has already crashed and burned once ..  domain names did not experience that shock..  If there is a redux of 2000/2001 you can expect domain names to perform in a similar manner as before.

I'm not so sure all of Facebook's 15 Billion will come out the same way.

Ebay Opens Microfinancing Site.

Loan $100 to an entrepreneur in "developing countries".

Josh says: "Good to see more of these opening up."

http://www.news.com/New-eBay-site-lets-people-finance-worlds-poor/2100-1038_3-6214974.html?tag=nefd.top

***FS***  I was just contemplating making a loan to somebody via prosper.com when it occurred to me that I could build a similar site at personalloans.com and plumb all my loan traffic to that site to kick-start things.  Great times to be a developer/name owner

Ron Jackson on The Death of News on Paper.

King_among_princesIn today's (Oct 24th 2007) Lowdown

http://www.dnjournal.com/lowdown.htm

***FS***  Well said Ron.   We all know it's coming..  Some folks can't see the forest for the trees..  but they will.  Ron references this piece in CNN Money

My favorite quote: "You know you are fading into obscurity when finanancial analysts won't even bother to cover your industry any more." ..   So true.

TechCrunch Blog (website) Brings in 2.88 M in Ad Revenue Per Year

http://www.sfgate.com:80/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/10/21/BUVJSNSTC.DTL

***FS***  Power to the Blogger

October 22, 2007

A Search Engine .. Powered by Millions of Domain Names

Danno writes:

Danno"Hi,

If there ever was a time in human history for a few 'domainers' and a few 'seo'ers/sem'ers' that understand domains and Internet search...to come together.

Now would be the time to for a "Field of Dreams" moment... 'build it and they will come'.

___

Dogpile Beats Google, Again Top Search Engine in Customer Satisfaction
http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2007/10/18/dogpile-beats-google-again-top-search-engine-in-customer-satisfaction/

Peace!
Dan"

***FS***  A bunch of domain registrants plumbing their traffic from countless individual names to the results page realting to the name's subject matter within the search engine.  Type eatingdisorders.com and get to Dogpile results for "eating disorders"  ..  Not a bad idea Danno..  but if you really think about it,  we already have that in the form of Google..  GOOG gets millions of unique visits each day to their domainpark syndication channel from domains like yours and mine  ;) ..  still this engine would be owned by the domain registrants .. a co-op..  I like the idea..  but it's hard to align interests. Great idea Danno.

October 20, 2007

Castello Brothers Give Thumbs-up to T.R.A.F.F.I.C East 2007

3hamdavidschillingmichael_2Josh sends link: ""Forbes, Ham and Schilling mentioned in first paragraph. They also use the word ballyhooed in their article.""

http://www.associatedcities.com/news.php?newsID=132

***FS*** It's not just these guys 'way with words' that makes them fascinating.  Nice guys, muscians, businessmen; upbeat, glass-half-full entrepreneurs -- the world needs people like this.

October 19, 2007

Viacom's Bet on Web Diversity

Viacomhttp://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2007/10/viacoms_bet_on.html

Quote: "...But in the process of defending his position, he [Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman] did make it clear that Viacom is betting big on the notion that people online will travel to hundreds of individual Web sites for the content they want to view."

***FS*** Not hundreds of sites Mr. Dauman..  Millions of small microsites built across tens of millions of domain names. Same thing has been happening since the dawn of the commercial Internet. Just think of all those viacom billboards you own... displaying different adver-content to different drivers with different interests in different cities. Now think about a network of hundreds of thosands of domain names (microsites) displaying different advercontent to different people in different parts of the world.. You're getting warmer  :)

IPhone SDK coming in Feb - Steve Jobs

Josh sends link:

Iphonemapeiffel http://www.apple.com/hotnews/

""Imo, this will indirectly benefit next gen mobile computing/ and next gen mobile browsing, as the iphone will morph more into a mobile computer. My prediction is that other phone manufacturers will head in a similar direction, especially with respect to standard web browsing on a phone.  The need for WAP compliant or mobile compliant websites may indeed diminish over the medium/long term.  If this is correct, then .mobi's touted importance of it's technical edge in delivering mobile friendly web content will diminish.

If .mobi is more of a marketing play, then it's still up in the air, imo, as it's possible that future web sites will look fine on desktops, laptops and phones, without needing to tweak the content for phones.""

***FS*** I agree with you.