Traffic

October 26, 2007

Traffic Arbitrage for Everyone

Regular reader writes:

""Web traffic arbitrage means a few things.

The best way to learn this is to do some preliminary research and then begin to do it.  It can be done on a very low budget during the learning stage.

I am posting text ads on one network and then sending to parked pages that have an ad feed from a different network.  Doing it very small scale for now, to make sure I really understand the subtleties. Have seen a few darn interesting little profit bubbles. Testing with travel and vehicle related keywords.

I understand now how someone could make $ 1,000 or more in one day doing
this. Not easy to do, but possibly achievable.

On a separate note. I found an old name of mine that wasn't active.

********.com.

It used to get 4 to 5 type ins a day a few years ago. I turned it on recently, and it's averaging about 55-60 type ins a day. 80 percent of the traffic is USA, Canada, England, Ireland and Australia. Pointed to X (a parking company), and it started making 60 cents a day. Then 4 days later, pointed it to y (a parking company), and it's now making 1.75 - 2.50 a day. I've just signed up for Z (a parking company), and i think it's possible this domain is going to make 4 or 5 dollars a day.

Interesting process.

Great blog, Frank.

The Value of Mobile Internet Traffic

"What is a click-through on a mobile phone worth?"

http://domainnamewire.com/2007/10/24/mobile-ads-are-worthless/

***FS*** Andrew says not very much, in his experience.  I've always suspected as much.. Picture yourself browsing on your phone..  you have limited battery life..  you're hurried..  The desktop browsing experience is lean-forward marketing..  You're sitting upright in front of your computer..  you're engaged..  you have a workspace and the ability to reach for your credit card.  :)  Not so in the mobile experience,  with the exception of passengers in an automobile.

The Free Internet .. Domain Names as 'Your' Platform

SaharSahar writes:

"Here’s a domain-parking related post on Mashable I found interesting… how parked pages are perceived by non domainers: Three Clicks to Spam: Google’s Hypocritical Link Selling Policy http://mashable.com/2007/10/24/google-page-rank/ Thanks!" "

***FS***  Sahar is correct of course..  Everything in life is a matter of perception or a gradient-optic through which you view things. Create a domain name and point it to your registrar's placeholder page and the name is "unused" ..  add advertising of your own and the name is "parked"..  Heaven forbid your inactive domain with advertising gets indexed into almighty Google..  If this happens by accident or design, you've unwittingly created the sinister sounding "Spam page" .. Point your spam page to another website to make money from those visitors and the name becomes "inactive". At least in some peoples eyes.  Never have so many "inactive" domains made so much, for so many active entrepreneurs.

Life is full of labels and when you're Google and your mission is the domination of Internet search, navigation and online user behavior, then it serves you well to create labels which empower you and weaken those who could challenge you.

I like Google the search utility a great deal, but I am  less than enamored with Google the marketing machine and businessman.  Google has managed to convince the world it does no wrong. It is a "happy fun ball of love" :) Not true of course. Google creates what business people perceive as great wrongs each day, but sells the masses on the fact that those wrongs are either not occurring or justified in the name of a greater Google.

Quote: ""...For Google’s part, the reason these sites are being slammed is because the company’s policy tells web publishers to “avoid links to web spammers or “bad neighborhoods” on the web.” Do some of the effected blogs sell links to such sites? Perhaps; we’ll let these folks defend themselves and their practices. But the real story is the hypocrisy of Google enforcing this policy on third-party publishers, when within their own engine they profit immensely by selling ads to spammers and so-called “bad neighborhoods.”"

Reading this I was reminded of the gent Vern told me about who attended a recent SES show.  This gent was practically in tears that his livelihood was wiped out after his site was scrubbed from Google's index, and he couldn't for the life of him get an answer or explanation as to what he had done wrong. Google giveth and Google taketh away..  When Google giveth it is your best friend.. But it's really sad to watch the "Google taketh away part" as Verno described it. People starting over..  but not knowing why or where to begin.

""Of course what Google was really doing was playing politics. Better than most, I might add. Sans the lobbyists and open debates, Google was working the people. Price controls? No, Google doesn’t control prices. Google measures quality, and adjusts pricing based on quality scores."" ...  Reading this quote Danno sent from Johnon's blog really struck me... 

As a domainer I get the majority of my traffic from "outside the Google framework". Google knows my sites exist but for the most part they work to actively deny visitors typing the domains I own (at Google) from ever finding my website in their search results.  I exist on the "Free Internet", you can navigate to me in your address bar because I run a real website.  But to believe Google's marketing machine, I reside in the "Bad neighborhoods" of the net. Why else couldn't you find me?  Because my sites advertising made me too much money for Google's liking?  Because I was displaying a Google competitor's ads?

You see Google knows my websites contain advertising. They hypocritically take visitors trying to navigate to my "bad neighborhood" and show show results with different advertising or content... In their view, this 'sleight of hand' miraculously gentrifies the Internet.

Luckily for me, Google only takes the dumbest and laziest of my visitors.  Millions of people say "screw this". Google won't give me the site I really want so I'll just head to my trusty address bar and leave 'the Google' for the site I really wanted. It's frustrating for users, but a necessary frustration that reinforces to users that the authoritative way to locate a website is via the browser,  not 'the Google'.

Plenty of others have been brainwashed into viewing the net the way Google wants them to. Tens of thousands of the Internet's brightest dutifully attend SES, they leave friends, family, loved ones - They miss life's important moments so they can serve the Google. When I look out across the floor of a show like SES, I see a group of people who have largely abandoned the Free Internet in favor of being a servant to the Google.

Remember that guy crying about his lost livelihood at SES?  Everybody attending that conference is "that guy" ..  like the car wreck you pass on your way home during rush hour..  That could have been you. Every person who ignores organic domain name traffic and embraces Google alone is basically selling themselves into a lifetime of servitude..  You are beholden to Google to get your traffic forever. God help you if they turn on you.

I guess a lot of this post is common sense with a bit of bluster.  Buy into another party's "platform" and live and die by "their" platform. Things could be worse I suppose. You can learn the "new smart pricing tricks" in 6-9 months..  and "quality adjustments" can be mastered in another 6 months.. as you gray, dancing to the tune Google plays for you, their black-box ensures that Google's house will always win.  Your revenue will remain flat, theirs won't. You will feel like an entrepreneur, but in the end, "you" work for "them".

Well good luck to you my SEO friends. If you're looking for me, I'll be on the Free Internet..  Buying generic names like Scott Day's DiamondsDirect.com ..  logical sounding generic domains.. I have opted out of the Google traffic generator in favor of creating sites for the 20 or 30 visitors who find their way to names like that each day.  The more sites you acquire the greater the trickle of traffic you get.  Buy enough and the trickle becomes a torrent. You can arbitrage traffic from Google (when they let you) and increasingly from other reliable traffic sources such as Microsoft, Facebook or traditional media in order to sell products, sales leads and other advertising.

When you own a generic domain name you join the Free Internet.. I encourage you to stake your own claim here and release the chains that bend your perception. Long Live the Free Internet.

October 25, 2007

Whizzbang: Traffic Quality: Part 4, End of Series.

Mg http://www.whizzbangsblog.com/content/view/301/86/

Lot of work Michael..  very well put together

October 23, 2007

Traffic Quality Part 3 on Michael Gilmour's Blog

Mg http://www.whizzbangsblog.com/content/view/300/86/

More great charts in this piece..  I never liked Google "smart-pricing" because it rates Google's own traffic at the 100% level..  If your traffic converts better than Google's (which most domain traffic does) you don't get paid any extra. This is going to backfire at some point as the good traffic gets removed and sold to lead-gen guys and others who get this..  leaving the se3cond rate traffic on PPC networks.. not today tho.

October 22, 2007

A Search Engine .. Powered by Millions of Domain Names

Danno writes:

Danno"Hi,

If there ever was a time in human history for a few 'domainers' and a few 'seo'ers/sem'ers' that understand domains and Internet search...to come together.

Now would be the time to for a "Field of Dreams" moment... 'build it and they will come'.

___

Dogpile Beats Google, Again Top Search Engine in Customer Satisfaction
http://www.mediabuyerplanner.com/2007/10/18/dogpile-beats-google-again-top-search-engine-in-customer-satisfaction/

Peace!
Dan"

***FS***  A bunch of domain registrants plumbing their traffic from countless individual names to the results page realting to the name's subject matter within the search engine.  Type eatingdisorders.com and get to Dogpile results for "eating disorders"  ..  Not a bad idea Danno..  but if you really think about it,  we already have that in the form of Google..  GOOG gets millions of unique visits each day to their domainpark syndication channel from domains like yours and mine  ;) ..  still this engine would be owned by the domain registrants .. a co-op..  I like the idea..  but it's hard to align interests. Great idea Danno.

October 20, 2007

Trademark Law- What Search Marketers Should Know

Equity http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3627333

This is a topic that all domain registrants and paid-search marketers should familiarise themselves with.

October 19, 2007

Viacom's Bet on Web Diversity

Viacomhttp://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/techbeat/archives/2007/10/viacoms_bet_on.html

Quote: "...But in the process of defending his position, he [Viacom CEO Philippe Dauman] did make it clear that Viacom is betting big on the notion that people online will travel to hundreds of individual Web sites for the content they want to view."

***FS*** Not hundreds of sites Mr. Dauman..  Millions of small microsites built across tens of millions of domain names. Same thing has been happening since the dawn of the commercial Internet. Just think of all those viacom billboards you own... displaying different adver-content to different drivers with different interests in different cities. Now think about a network of hundreds of thosands of domain names (microsites) displaying different advercontent to different people in different parts of the world.. You're getting warmer  :)

CNET's Michael Horrowitz on Defensive Computing / Domain Names

MichaelhorowitzGeeky stuff ... Cnet blog post by Michael Horowitz about domain name forwarding. (Direct navigation.)  If anybody knows about the power of a great domain name it's CNET  (News.com, Seach.com, Com.com) .. 

These names drive huge huge traffic for CNET..  Com.com triggers a huge flood of error traffic in older Microsoft browsers that forward slow resolving DNS lookups for any domain name over to Domain.com.com ..  CNET activated this wildcard a year or two ago and experienced a significant surge in traffic. 

The domain names this company owns are what sets it apart from any other tech news websites. Honorable nod to some of the authoring there.

http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13554_1-9800302-33.html?tag=nefd.blgs

October 18, 2007

More Hazy Flashbacks from TRAFFIC Miami..

Supergroup_vernoryanVern and Ryan form a new Supergroup to rival ABBA and the Bee-Gees. Vern on Skin-flute, Ryan on Spoons.

Dan_warnerkiafrank_and_melDan Warner far left, Kia, Frank and Mel.

ElliotfrankandthepopeElliot Noss,  Frank and The 'Domain Pope' Dr. Berryhill

John_kane_with_supergroup_vernoryan

Demand Media's John Kane poses with the well worn Supergroup..  maybe just a single city tour fellas?

Ryan_frank_and_mel Me with some of my favorite Peeps. (Cherminator canoodling with Verno at right)